March
5, 1999
Local
control has been the mantra of politicians and bureaucrats for quite some time
now, but today what does it really mean?
The answer isn’t quite as simple as it once was.
Used
to be, when a community wanted to do something, everyone knew that the
decisions affecting the community were in fact made by local citizens. Everyone pitched in and things got done. Money was raised by local folks, materials
often were donated, and a local company provided the know how and the labor.
Today
it is a little more complicated. Local
folks may in fact get together to decide to address a problem or to do
something, but that’s about where the similarities end. Not much is going to happen until higher
levels of government have been brought “to the table.” Why?
Because almost anything a community wants done requires the involvement
of or approval from government at some
higher level whether it be county, state or federal.
Take
the I-5 interchange project in Woodburn that has been under discussion for more
than 15 years now. Most recently, we
have local businesses, city, county and state representatives “at the table” to
figure out a solution the traffic congestion along 214 and at the I-5
interchange.
Most
citizens in Woodburn know that over the past 15 years, there have been almost
as many committees studying this “problem,” and that each committee has come to
almost exactly the same conclusion.
What is so puzzling is that the Oregon Department of Transportation
can’t seem to figure out a solution. Or
is it they don’t like the solution the local community has come to?
Over
the course of these many years, each time a committee has come up with a
solution, the Department of Transportation has said, “Great, we’ll add you to
the list.” Then, when local folks start
asking why the project isn’t going anywhere, they are told they need a new
committee, new studies and, of course, a way to find the money. And in the meantime, there is an entire
changing of the guard at ODOT and we are all back at the drawing board.
Nevertheless,
here we are once again listening to some new ODOT expert telling worn out
business owners the history of this dilemma.
Then, to the chagrin of the local business owners, ODOT’s latest
proposal is nothing more than a band-aid approach to this age-old
nightmare. And worse, a band-aid that would have to be reapplied in
five years!
These
local business owners are to be commended.
They have offered to donate their right-of-way, which would accommodate
two eastbound lanes, two westbound lanes, a turn lane sidewalks and bike
paths. They have said, “Don’t monkey around with half a solution. Don’t prolong this any longer. Just do it!”
They
have had enough. They want to run their
businesses, serve their customers and get on with life. They have offered a phenomenal
solution. ODOT should be grateful for
such community involvement. After all,
isn’t this the essence of local control?
We
all want to be hopeful that this old-fashioned approach to solving problems
will succeed. But, ODOT official have
merely said, “We’ll get back to you.”
Stay
tuned. This isn’t the end of this
saga. But as always, please feel free
to call. I want to hear your ideas on local
decision making and local control. You
can e-mail me at pmilne@open.org.